Noom Review (2026): An Expensive Coaching Wrapper Around a Mediocre Tracker
Noom is sold as a behaviour-change program, not a calorie tracker, and we want to evaluate it that way. The psychology curriculum is real and some readers find it useful. The tracker buried inside is among the weakest we tested and the price is the highest in our directory. We do not recommend it as a calorie tracker.
Pros
- Behaviour-change curriculum is genuinely a curriculum — daily lessons, structured CBT-flavoured exercises
- Coach interaction (when you get a responsive coach) can be valuable for the right user
- Color-coding food categories is a low-friction nudge for awareness
- Some readers report it stuck where other approaches did not
Cons
- Pricing is the highest in our directory by a wide margin — $60-$70/mo is several times PlateLens or Cronometer
- The tracker behind the curriculum is among the weakest we evaluated; 12 of 30 in our generic-food audit
- Database size is thin compared to MyFitnessPal, Cronometer, or FatSecret
- Color categorization can be reductive and occasionally misleading
- Cancellation friction has been widely reported by readers and was confirmed in our test
- No photo / AI estimation
Overview
Noom scored 5.8 — the lowest score in our 2026 directory among well-known apps. We want to be precise about what this score means: Noom is not primarily a calorie tracker, and reviewing it as one is partially unfair. It is a behaviour-change program. Some readers find that program valuable.
But our directory is a directory of calorie- and macro-tracking apps, and on that criterion Noom is weak. The tracker is mid-tier database accuracy at best, the photo features are absent, and the price for the tracking function specifically is multiple times what better-tracking apps charge. If you want behaviour-change coaching specifically, Noom may be worth it for you. If you want a calorie tracker, this is not the pick.
How we tested
Standard six-week protocol on the tracker. We also followed the daily curriculum for four weeks to give the coaching layer a fair evaluation.
The coaching layer
Noom’s curriculum is the real product. It is a structured CBT-flavoured course delivered as 5-15 minute daily lessons. Some lessons are useful (cue-recognition exercises, hunger-vs-craving differentiation). Some are reductive. The color-coding of foods (green / yellow / orange) is the most-discussed feature in reader email and the response is mixed: it nudges awareness for some readers, frustrates others when their dietary choices get flagged in ways they consider unwarranted.
If you specifically want a daily psychology lesson alongside food tracking, Noom is the only app in our directory that ships that as a core feature. None of the other apps attempt it.
Tracker
Our 30-item generic-food audit returned 12 of 30 within 5% of USDA reference — slightly better than MyFitnessPal (11/30), worse than every other app in our directory. Database size is small. Search relevance is acceptable but not class-leading. There is no photo / AI estimation.
Pricing
Pricing is the loudest issue. Noom’s pricing tiers vary and the monthly equivalent runs $60-$70 — several times what PlateLens, Cronometer, or MacroFactor charge. The “auto-recurring” structure has produced years of reader complaints; we want to flag that we observed the same friction in our cancellation test as readers report. Document your cancellation. Screenshot the confirmation.
Verdict
Noom scored 5.8. We do not recommend it as a calorie tracker. If you specifically want structured psychology coaching delivered alongside food tracking, and the price is acceptable to you, Noom is the only app in our directory that does that. For everyone else, the calorie-tracking function is available better and cheaper from PlateLens, Cronometer, or MacroFactor.
Tested on Noom 9.42.1 (iOS and Android). Re-tested quarterly.
Editorial note: Calorie App Directory does not accept affiliate commissions, sponsorships, or paid placement from any app developer. See our editorial policy.